About the 'Ideological Container'

 If in Islam there is a caliphate, in Christology there is a papacy. in general in abrahamic called priesthood. in other religions do not know.

Sometimes in the parable of the ark of safety

Sometimes it is likened to a house

Sometimes it is likened to a tree

, a swarm of ants, bees

Those that are not in a container are considered stray sheep, fragile like spiders. Or even become a wolf, a snake

It is clear indeed, without a system a person is relatively more fragile. Because they move independently and only compete with each other's luck.

Although maybe there are people who are actually suitable to move alone (because they are talented there). Something like this, if in the animal world it might be compared to an eagle, which is quite safe to move on its own

While I have come to a conclusion, being a container or not depends on the circumstances, the characteristics of the elements. There are times when it is good to use, there are times when it is not.

In addition, it often happens that a container is misused

In the abrahamic sphere, different 'organizations' often lead to war. Assuming only one 'container' is correct.

While in the scope of Buddhism what I know is the sangha, even though it seems that the difference in 'organization' in the Buddhist world doesn't really trigger friction (don't know exactly)

In the Hindu world, I don't know